July 6, 2020
AliExpress WW
2022: A Vaccination Passport. The EU Keeps Quiet Over Suspicious Documents

2022: A Vaccination Passport. The EU Keeps Quiet Over Suspicious Documents

AliExpress WW

Written by Daniele Pozzati through the Strategic Culture Foundation,

AliExpress WW

Surprise, surprise, the European Commission (EC) had a “vaccination roadmap,” prepared several months before the COVID-19 pandemic.

The roadmap should lead to a “proposal by the commission on general vaccination card / passport for EU citizens by 2022. “

Last update in the third quarter of 2019 10 page document September 12 was followed by the “global vaccination summit” shared EC and World Health Organization (WHO).

Under the heading “Ten Actions on the Way to Vaccination for All – Everyone Must Have the Benefit of Vaccination” summit manifest complains that:

“Despite the availability of safe and effective vaccines, lack of access, lack of vaccines, misinformation, complacency about disease risks, reduced public confidence in the value of vaccines and deductions, are damaging vaccination rates worldwide.”

And with them, perhaps, the profits of pharmaceutical companies.

In July 2017, for example, Italy has made 12 vaccinations compulsory for children, Subsequently, the prices of these same vaccines rose by 62%: from the average price per dose from 14.02 euros to 22.74 euros.

global vaccination market currently worth $ 27 billion a year. According to WHO estimates, by 2025 it will reach 100 billion US dollars.

As the updated immunization agenda for 2030 was also discussed at the EU-WHO global vaccination summit, shareholders of large pharmaceutical companies need not worry about the long-term effectiveness of their stocks.

In fact, one should not “harm vaccination rates worldwide.”

Further, the manifesto of the World Summit on Vaccination lists 10 “lessons (…) and the steps required for vaccination for all.”

Each “lesson” is the pearl of what the Italian neo-Marxist philosopher Diego Fusaro calls “therapeutic capitalism”.

The wording is obligatory and leaves no room for nuances and disputes. Adjectives such as “everyone”, “everyone”, “indisputably” abound. Statements in conditional mood are absent.

More than a cautious, scientifically inspired and undeniable action plan, the tone – “protect everyone everywhere”, “leave no one behind” – is unacceptably messianic.

What about those who do not want to be “protected” in this way? In Germany alone, approximately 10% of the total population, or 8 million people, strongly against vaccination against the crown,

But let’s see what we can learn, so to speak, in these “lessons”.

Lesson 1 begins with: “Promoting global political leadership and a commitment to vaccination” – this seems to be what we are seeing now, when governments around the world assume that masks and social distances will remain in place until a vaccine is found for Corona-Sars2.

What about those politicians who are against vaccination?

Will their voters say how EU Budget Commissioner Gunter Oettinger (c) famously did with Italian voters in 2018 that “the markets will teach them to vote for the right things?”.

Will a new pandemic break out to teach people to vote for the right things?

Lesson 4 “Addressing the root causes of vaccine indecision, increasing confidence in vaccination” looks like a plan for a major advocacy campaign that includes – we read in the “EU Vaccination Roadmap” – “Developing e-Learning Education”. modules for general practitioners and primary health care providers, aimed at improving skills to work with fluctuating populations and promoting behavior change. ”

Lesson 5, “Using the power of digital technology to strengthen monitoring of vaccine program effectiveness,” raises legitimate concerns when tracking applications and e-bracelets about the continued invasion of technology in our lives and bodies,

What digital technologies are we talking about? Maybe a subcutaneous chip, like the one that recently patented satanic number 060606 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation?

Lesson 9, for a non-mainstream journalist and for freedom of speech in general, is the most threatening [the bolded type is mine]:

“Empowering healthcare providers at all levels as well as the media, in provide effective, transparent and objective information to the public and fight false and misleading information, including through interaction with social networking platforms and technology companies. “

Here we are: the fight against so-called fake news has returned. More work for Facebook’s self-styled “fact checkers”,

Fake News is, of course, the Orwellian Newspeak for any non-aligned information, regardless of its content, origin or verifiability.

Indeed, the global vaccination manifesto does not define “objective information” or “false and misleading information”.

If vaccines are as safe as the EU and WHO claim, without providing any evidence why, then the US government created an entity called National Vaccine Harm Compensation Program (VICP)?

To ensure this, we read on the official VICP website, “an unmistakable alternative to the traditional legal system for resolving claims of the dangers of vaccination.”

It would seem quite successful.

Between 10/01/1988 (when the VIKP began to award compensation for damage) and 06/01/2020 (the latest available data), the IPPC awarded a total of 4 385 672 580,43 US dollars in compensation.

This figure does not include compensation resulting from a valid lawsuit, in particular a class action, against Big Pharma.

But as an Italian documentary Massimo Matsukko explains that US authorities have not stopped to protect Big Pharma from lawsuits.

In 2010, landmark decree US Supreme Court quoted US Code Header 42 thus:

“The law excludes producer liability for vaccines are inevitable, side effects“.

The same decree further clarifies:

“No vaccine manufacturer is liable in a civil action for damages resulting from injury or death associated with the vaccine associated with the introduction of the vaccine after October 1, 1988 …

… If injury or death occurred as a result of side effects that were unavoidable, even if the vaccine was properly prepared and accompanied by appropriate instructions and warnings. ”

Of course, 1988 was the year in which the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program began to award compensation to victims of vaccine injuries – eliminating the legal headache of Big Pharma.

As a systems biologist Dr. Shiva Ayaduray indicates that the inability to sue pharmaceutical companies for vaccines, combined with a drop in drug sales, has turned vaccines into Big Pharma’s new business model.

And now the EU and WHO funded by Bill Gates go along with it.

“The government of the modern state,” wrote the famous Karl Marx in the “Communist Manifesto,” is just a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie. ”

If Marx was alive today, he might come to the conclusion that managing an international organization is just a committee for managing the common affairs of global elites.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: